<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Help! My editor is a sales manager (updated)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tamark.ca/public/2009/12/03/help-my-editor-is-a-sales-manager/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tamark.ca/public/2009/12/03/help-my-editor-is-a-sales-manager/</link>
	<description>It&#039;s about the journalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 00:39:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kirk Pedersen</title>
		<link>http://www.tamark.ca/public/2009/12/03/help-my-editor-is-a-sales-manager/comment-page-1/#comment-454507</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirk Pedersen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 00:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamark.ca/students/?p=4369#comment-454507</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a shame that it&#039;s gotten this far. In many ways, content is driven by advertisers, but having editorial staff members report to sales people is nothing short of ridiculous and borders on insulting.

The job of sales staff should be to sell the content/voice journalists produce, not the other way around. 

I can see the logic of some reporters just shrugging their shoulders and taking it as a means of survival. As one commenter on the story put it - and I&#039;m paraphrasing - adapt or wait for your layoff notice. 

It&#039;s a sad - but apt - commentary on how things work now in the journalism &#039;industry&#039;. 

I got my layoff notice - one of one! - four months ago from the online arm of a community newspaper publisher whose major way of earning money was &#039;we sell ads (for considerably less money because nobody looks at our websites because they aren&#039;t properly &#039;fed&#039; with content because editors are ridiculously overworked as it is and reporters don&#039;t want additional tasks involving no additional compensation).&#039; 

I could see the writing on the wall months before I finally got my pink slip. 

I&#039;m lucky that I was able to find a &#039;corporate&#039; job a month later, but I can&#039;t help but feel bad for the 20-year journos who are going to be out on their butts in the next few years as newsrooms shrink again. 

Love the blog, Mark. Still using the stuff you taught me even though I&#039;m currently not in the industry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a shame that it&#8217;s gotten this far. In many ways, content is driven by advertisers, but having editorial staff members report to sales people is nothing short of ridiculous and borders on insulting.</p>
<p>The job of sales staff should be to sell the content/voice journalists produce, not the other way around. </p>
<p>I can see the logic of some reporters just shrugging their shoulders and taking it as a means of survival. As one commenter on the story put it &#8211; and I&#8217;m paraphrasing &#8211; adapt or wait for your layoff notice. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a sad &#8211; but apt &#8211; commentary on how things work now in the journalism &#8216;industry&#8217;. </p>
<p>I got my layoff notice &#8211; one of one! &#8211; four months ago from the online arm of a community newspaper publisher whose major way of earning money was &#8216;we sell ads (for considerably less money because nobody looks at our websites because they aren&#8217;t properly &#8216;fed&#8217; with content because editors are ridiculously overworked as it is and reporters don&#8217;t want additional tasks involving no additional compensation).&#8217; </p>
<p>I could see the writing on the wall months before I finally got my pink slip. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m lucky that I was able to find a &#8216;corporate&#8217; job a month later, but I can&#8217;t help but feel bad for the 20-year journos who are going to be out on their butts in the next few years as newsrooms shrink again. </p>
<p>Love the blog, Mark. Still using the stuff you taught me even though I&#8217;m currently not in the industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Dallas Morning News pulls down the wall</title>
		<link>http://www.tamark.ca/public/2009/12/03/help-my-editor-is-a-sales-manager/comment-page-1/#comment-454429</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dallas Morning News pulls down the wall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 22:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamark.ca/students/?p=4369#comment-454429</guid>
		<description>[...] the corruption of the paper&#8217;s coverage&#8221;). And journalism prof Mark Hamilton said that most of the sections involved weren&#8217;t exactly bastions of enterprising journalism to begin [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the corruption of the paper&#8217;s coverage&#8221;). And journalism prof Mark Hamilton said that most of the sections involved weren&#8217;t exactly bastions of enterprising journalism to begin [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: This week in media musings: More Murdoch fallout, and Dallas tears down that wall &#124; Mark Coddington</title>
		<link>http://www.tamark.ca/public/2009/12/03/help-my-editor-is-a-sales-manager/comment-page-1/#comment-454415</link>
		<dc:creator>This week in media musings: More Murdoch fallout, and Dallas tears down that wall &#124; Mark Coddington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 20:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamark.ca/students/?p=4369#comment-454415</guid>
		<description>[...] Alan Mutter thinks the news folks&#8217; tenacity could rub off on the ad side, Canadian j-prof Mark Hamilton thinks the collaboration could help fund better reporting, and the Nieman Journalism Lab&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Alan Mutter thinks the news folks&#8217; tenacity could rub off on the ad side, Canadian j-prof Mark Hamilton thinks the collaboration could help fund better reporting, and the Nieman Journalism Lab&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: All in All, It&#8217;s Just Another Brick in the Wall &#171; The Watershed Chronicle</title>
		<link>http://www.tamark.ca/public/2009/12/03/help-my-editor-is-a-sales-manager/comment-page-1/#comment-454414</link>
		<dc:creator>All in All, It&#8217;s Just Another Brick in the Wall &#171; The Watershed Chronicle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 19:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamark.ca/students/?p=4369#comment-454414</guid>
		<description>[...] has been a pretty significant (more than I expected) let&#8217;s-wait-and-see attitude.  Here and here are two such opinions.  While my initial reaction was of the &#8220;here comes the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has been a pretty significant (more than I expected) let&#8217;s-wait-and-see attitude.  Here and here are two such opinions.  While my initial reaction was of the &#8220;here comes the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Hamilton</title>
		<link>http://www.tamark.ca/public/2009/12/03/help-my-editor-is-a-sales-manager/comment-page-1/#comment-454402</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Hamilton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 17:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamark.ca/students/?p=4369#comment-454402</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Carrie.

It&#039;s interesting to watch the debate unfold on this. There are more people taking the this-might-not-be-a-bad-idea approach than I first suspected their might be.

Mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Carrie.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s interesting to watch the debate unfold on this. There are more people taking the this-might-not-be-a-bad-idea approach than I first suspected their might be.</p>
<p>Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

