<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Journalists at work</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tamark.ca/public/2008/02/07/journalists-at-work/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tamark.ca/public/2008/02/07/journalists-at-work/</link>
	<description>It&#039;s about the journalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 08:09:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Austin Whitten</title>
		<link>http://www.tamark.ca/public/2008/02/07/journalists-at-work/comment-page-1/#comment-452638</link>
		<dc:creator>Austin Whitten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 10:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamark.ca/students/2008/02/07/journalists-at-work/#comment-452638</guid>
		<description>Another example was in the Globe yesterday:

Charles, Camilla rent yacht in eco-friendly move
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080208.wcharlesyacht0208/BNStory/International/home

It also elicited scathing criticism. I filed one of them (Austin Whitten) to focus on what The Globe is doing - printing PR releases without comment - and another on the issue itself.

Are we seeing lazy journalism at G &amp; M or perhaps something else. There is a current school of journalism that thinks generating controversy by printing outrageous statements is &#039;good&#039; reporting, i.e., good for selling papers. This comes from the same &#039;villain-victim&#039; model journos are encouraged to follow, i.e., every story must have a &#039;villain and a &#039;victim&#039;, again, to enhance sales. This is what journalism has descended to and why polls show journalists are below used car salesmen these days in popularity. What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another example was in the Globe yesterday:</p>
<p>Charles, Camilla rent yacht in eco-friendly move<br />
<a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080208.wcharlesyacht0208/BNStory/International/home" rel="nofollow">http://www.theglobeandmail.com.....ional/home</a></p>
<p>It also elicited scathing criticism. I filed one of them (Austin Whitten) to focus on what The Globe is doing &#8211; printing PR releases without comment &#8211; and another on the issue itself.</p>
<p>Are we seeing lazy journalism at G &amp; M or perhaps something else. There is a current school of journalism that thinks generating controversy by printing outrageous statements is &#8216;good&#8217; reporting, i.e., good for selling papers. This comes from the same &#8216;villain-victim&#8217; model journos are encouraged to follow, i.e., every story must have a &#8216;villain and a &#8216;victim&#8217;, again, to enhance sales. This is what journalism has descended to and why polls show journalists are below used car salesmen these days in popularity. What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digidav</title>
		<link>http://www.tamark.ca/public/2008/02/07/journalists-at-work/comment-page-1/#comment-452622</link>
		<dc:creator>Digidav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 04:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamark.ca/students/2008/02/07/journalists-at-work/#comment-452622</guid>
		<description>Agreed. Have you checked out NewsTrust.net, where in full disclosure I am a contributing editor?

It tries to rate the news based on journalistic quality -- keeping journalists and news organizations accountable. Might actually be a good tool to teach media literacy to students.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. Have you checked out NewsTrust.net, where in full disclosure I am a contributing editor?</p>
<p>It tries to rate the news based on journalistic quality &#8212; keeping journalists and news organizations accountable. Might actually be a good tool to teach media literacy to students.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

