<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tackling myths</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tamark.ca/public/2007/03/27/tackling-myths/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tamark.ca/public/2007/03/27/tackling-myths/</link>
	<description>It&#039;s about the journalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 17:07:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Oliver Reichenstein</title>
		<link>http://www.tamark.ca/public/2007/03/27/tackling-myths/comment-page-1/#comment-113139</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Reichenstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 13:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamark.ca/students/2007/03/27/tackling-myths/#comment-113139</guid>
		<description>Hi again, I just posted a sketch that illustrates how the Washington Post would look as a wiki according to the 10 iron rules:

http://www.informationarchitects.jp/washington-post-redesign-as-a-wiki</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi again, I just posted a sketch that illustrates how the Washington Post would look as a wiki according to the 10 iron rules:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.informationarchitects.jp/washington-post-redesign-as-a-wiki" rel="nofollow">http://www.informationarchitec.....-as-a-wiki</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver Reichenstein</title>
		<link>http://www.tamark.ca/public/2007/03/27/tackling-myths/comment-page-1/#comment-111722</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Reichenstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 09:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamark.ca/students/2007/03/27/tackling-myths/#comment-111722</guid>
		<description>Nice drilldown, Mark, and thanks for the compliments. Of course, the first post was a little harsh, but the nature of the media forces us to be short. That is good at times, as the need to be short makes us think harder, but then again, delicate reflection needs – paper. ; )

Just one add on:

Myth 8: The web is just a trend. No need to panic.
Fact 8: Change or die

This caricature of a headline points to: 
1) the Economist&#039;s piece back in October 2006 that basically said: News media is &quot;Cause for concern but not for panic.&quot; 
2) the attitude old journalists show when talking to new media people, acting like web workers are some funny tech freaks, detached from reality

Nevertheless I agree that there is considerable rhetoric in the 10 myths piece, rhetoric not in the sense of manipulation, but in the sense of forced shortness...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice drilldown, Mark, and thanks for the compliments. Of course, the first post was a little harsh, but the nature of the media forces us to be short. That is good at times, as the need to be short makes us think harder, but then again, delicate reflection needs – paper. ; )</p>
<p>Just one add on:</p>
<p>Myth 8: The web is just a trend. No need to panic.<br />
Fact 8: Change or die</p>
<p>This caricature of a headline points to:<br />
1) the Economist&#8217;s piece back in October 2006 that basically said: News media is &#8220;Cause for concern but not for panic.&#8221;<br />
2) the attitude old journalists show when talking to new media people, acting like web workers are some funny tech freaks, detached from reality</p>
<p>Nevertheless I agree that there is considerable rhetoric in the 10 myths piece, rhetoric not in the sense of manipulation, but in the sense of forced shortness&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

