<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Talking back</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tamark.ca/public/2006/02/13/talking-back-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tamark.ca/public/2006/02/13/talking-back-2/</link>
	<description>It&#039;s about the journalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 08:09:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Roch101</title>
		<link>http://www.tamark.ca/public/2006/02/13/talking-back-2/comment-page-1/#comment-454024</link>
		<dc:creator>Roch101</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 19:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamark.ca/students/?p=2057#comment-454024</guid>
		<description>Sorry I missed this when it was new. Thanks for the opinion.

Roch Smith</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry I missed this when it was new. Thanks for the opinion.</p>
<p>Roch Smith</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.tamark.ca/public/2006/02/13/talking-back-2/comment-page-1/#comment-9011</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamark.ca/students/?p=2057#comment-9011</guid>
		<description>Hi Mark,
You touch upon one of the dark secrets of journalits -- we don&#039;t trust other journalists (either professional or amateur.)
Maybe this is a function of our worst traits. We&#039;ve been reporters. We know how easy it is to screw a source in print. So we hesitate to give anyone the chance to do the same to us.
Or perhaps it&#039;s simple cowardice.
Or simple arrogance.
I&#039;ve spent a lot of time thinking about this issue of late. I&#039;m working on a new product that requires that I talk to media professionals about blogs. In particular, I&#039;m trying to arrange interviews wiht the people who work on magazine-run blogs.
So far I&#039;ve asked 10 journalists in writing for interviews. None have even responded.
Contrast that with the responses from publishers and CEOs -- 100% of them have returned my emails and every one has agreed to be interviewed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mark,<br />
You touch upon one of the dark secrets of journalits &#8212; we don&#8217;t trust other journalists (either professional or amateur.)<br />
Maybe this is a function of our worst traits. We&#8217;ve been reporters. We know how easy it is to screw a source in print. So we hesitate to give anyone the chance to do the same to us.<br />
Or perhaps it&#8217;s simple cowardice.<br />
Or simple arrogance.<br />
I&#8217;ve spent a lot of time thinking about this issue of late. I&#8217;m working on a new product that requires that I talk to media professionals about blogs. In particular, I&#8217;m trying to arrange interviews wiht the people who work on magazine-run blogs.<br />
So far I&#8217;ve asked 10 journalists in writing for interviews. None have even responded.<br />
Contrast that with the responses from publishers and CEOs &#8212; 100% of them have returned my emails and every one has agreed to be interviewed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

